There is foie gras ice cream in my freezer. (And yes, I had a bite for breakfast.)
Before you decide to be a Debbie Downer:
I think itâ€™s a bit dishonest for Bourdain to imply that Dâ€™Artagnan, an organic farm, says something about broader duck farming practices.
This document appears to me to paint a more realistic picture: An HSUS Report: The Welfare of Animals in the Duck Industry. Also, at base, the fact remains that, when we eat an animal, the animalâ€™s lifespan has almost certainly been reduced unnecessarily. Yes, I understand that most people experience a feeling of extraordinary apathy at this idea, but there it is anyway.
There are plenty of farms that treat their birds humanely and I am fortunate enough to have a chef friend who has just such a source. Iâ€™ve come to terms with my carnivorous tendencies, but agree there are some practices more humane than others. So long as AVMA doesnâ€™t see a problem with foie gras, I can sleep just fine and with a very happy tummy.
I am but a selfish glutton of a human who loves the taste of delicious so much Iâ€™d probably even try braised human gastrocnemius if served by capable hands. Especially with a side of foie gras.
So, they made their non-decision, â€œbecause limited peer-reviewed, scientific information dealing with the animal welfare concerns associated with foie gras production is available.â€ The translation seems to be, â€œWhen in doubt, assume that the thing you want to do is just fine.â€
Anyway, I respect that some people put in extra money and effort to make sure that the animal theyâ€™re eating was pampered and then received fellatio/cunnilingus as its organs were being gently massaged from its body.
I just think that people should feel something more like reverence for the meat they eat. I think of watching my mom gut and fillet a giant catfish. â€œTheyâ€™re so magnificent,â€ she said, cutting into the yawning animal with an electric knife, its sleek body twitching and wagging. â€œListen to it!â€ she said, teary-eyed, as it made its last stridulation grunt. â€œThey talk to you! It just kills me â€™cause theyâ€™re so smart!â€ She punctuated the last word by plopping some slimy entrails into a nearby bucket.
I think she earned her happy tummy by breaking her own heart.
So, I wonder, is it too much to ask that someone at least recite a monologue out of The Old Man and Sea every time they eat a Big Mac?
I believe they made their non-decision as Doctors should; with evidence. And as there was none, they acted accordingly. We are in agreeance that there should be more reverence. I think this Old Man and the Sea idea is excellent. I would like very much to hear â€œFood, I love you and respect you very much. But I will eat you dead before this day endsâ€ instead of a prayer prior to eating. Much more fitting. There is an awful lot of disconnect between people and their food and everything else we devour as consumers. If a life is going to be lost, albeit sooner than it may on its own, at least itâ€™s something thatâ€™s appreciated and not left to waste away, or gobbled up without a second thought of its origin. Hearts are broken in so many ways, to me, a happy tummy is a nice condolence.
Well, I would say that absence of evidence of pain in the animals is not evidence of absence. Therefore, people concerned with such things would be safest choosing a vegetarian alternative, a â€œfaux grasâ€ perhaps.
But, more than the discomfort to the creature, I am concerned with that relationship between the animal and its eater. The titular old man, after all, clearly has little alternative (monetarily and dietarily) than to fish. His love and respect for the animal are intimately connected to his knowledge of his reliance on that animal for, not pleasure, but survival.
I gave vegetarianism a go for a few years, but ultimately decided I donâ€™t eat for survival, but for pleasure. As I realize I will never be an idealistic Hemingway character, I will continue to enjoy the innards of helpless animals. I appreciate and respect your valiant efforts to be a better human than I, and will be sure to enjoy my pain ridden ice cream with the most reverence possible.
OK, Emeril. I appreciate you entertaining my thoughts at least.
It was really the Bourdain clip that prompted my initial response. Iâ€™ve had a beef with Bourdain ever since I read in Kitchen Confidential that he has â€œnaked contemptâ€ for vegetarians: â€œVegetarians, and their Hezbollah-like splinter-faction the vegans, are a persistent irritant to any chef worth a damnâ€¦. [They] are the enemy of everything good and decent in the human spirit, an affront to all I stand for, the pure enjoyment of food.â€
Why the disdain, Bourdain? The only other justification he gives is that he once worked with a vegetarian who was a butthole. Nice.
What do I care? Well, like a lot of people, I think Bourdain is generally pretty cool. I donâ€™t need him to speak up in favor of vegetarianism, but it would be nice if he didnâ€™t actively undermine it.
He might say, for instance, that vegetarianism is just one more way to (not) skin a cat.
All right. Iâ€™ll dismount my high horse since itâ€™s dead now and thoroughly beaten. (Though, if it will go to waste, I would suggest it be eaten.)